![the living bible paraphrased app the living bible paraphrased app](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/41ByFahwNrL.jpg)
How do we know the NLT was a translation and not a paraphrase? While it was originally based on The Living Bible paraphrase, its textual basis is found in the original languages. If you expose yourself to a variety of translations, you’ll be able to better understand why translators make the interpretive decisions that they make. I don’t think you should read only one translation at all. But I don’t think you should read only the NLT. I think you should definitely read the NLT. That said, you should take any translation with a grain of salt. They’re simply trying to make the Bible as clear and understandable as possible to an English audience, and I think they met their goal. They’re not trying to poison God’s Word (and yes, I’ve heard this argument before). There is no hidden agenda behind the translation committee. While it does make many interpretations on behalf of the reader, for the most part, these are interpretations that we can trust. The NLT was born out of incredible scholarship. While this desire is understandable, it’s not possible. Many people are uncomfortable with this because they want to read the Bible as a blank slate, with no human interference. With more dynamic equivalent translations, like the New Living Translation, many of those interpretive decisions are made for the reader. Not without additional resources, such as scholarly articles and commentaries. However, the downside of this is that many readers are not able to make those interpretive leaps on their own. This is great because it allows the reader to make interpretive decisions on their own without being guided by the translation committee. The question is, how much interpretation needs to take place?Ī formal equivalent translation, such as the ESV, will do only as much interpretation as is necessary to get the words into English. In order to take words from ancient Hebrew and reflect those same ideas in modern English, interpretation has to happen. This means the NLT is quite a bit more interpretive than a translation like the NIV.īut here’s the thing. The more dynamic a translation becomes, the more interpretive it is. So if you’re looking for a readable and understandable translation that’s still totally based on the most up-to-date textual evidence that we have at our disposal, the NLT is probably the Bible for you. Its readability is unmatched by most other modern translations. The NLT is one of the most dynamic translations out there, since it aims to capture the clarity and beauty of the original Living Bible paraphrase. As such, it is a very dynamic equivalent translation, which means the text reflects an idea-for-idea philosophy instead of word-for-word. The translation philosophy of the New Living Translation is to emphasize English clarity. The NLT was originally published in 1996 with various updates since then, the most recent being in 2016. In my humble opinion, this is what a good translation of the Bible into English should be.
![the living bible paraphrased app the living bible paraphrased app](https://files.tyndale.com/thpdata/images--covers/HiResJPG/978-1-4964-3352-7.jpg)
The result is a beautiful hybrid of the accuracy and reliability of a large-scale translation and the beauty and clarity of a literary paraphrase. But at the same time, its development was immersed in the spirit of a popular paraphrase. So, at the end of the day, the New Living Translation is a translation, not a paraphrase. But there was also a team of English stylists working with the translators just to ensure that the flow of language adhered to the original feel of Taylor’s paraphrase. So the 90 scholars worked from the original Greek and Hebrew texts to create their translations. The committee went through several sweeps through the text before it became apparent that the best thing to do was just to create a brand new translation from scratch, which then became known as the New Living Translation. Each scholar would review their section of The Living Bible and submit their suggestions for details that needed updating.
#The living bible paraphrased app update#
So in 1989, almost twenty years after the original release of The Living Bible, 90 scholars from various religious traditions and academic disciplines came together to start working on the new version of The Living Bible, originally titled The New Living Version.Īs the update started, the Bible was divided up into six parts and assigned to different scholars. There were enough inaccuracies to warrant an update.
![the living bible paraphrased app the living bible paraphrased app](https://www.gotquestions.org/img/OG/The-Living-Bible-TLB.jpg)
However, as is to be expected with any large project of this scope taken on by one person, there were a few issues with the original paraphrase. Kenneth Taylor’s The Living Bible was widely received and loved by many.
#The living bible paraphrased app full#
The Difference Between the NIV and the NLT From the Revision of a Paraphrase to a Full Translation